Let's Talk Software

Even if you're not looking for custom software development, we're happy to chat about agile processes, tech stacks, architecture, or help with your ideas. Enter your contact information below and a member of our team will contact you.


    Clients who trust us to deliver on their custom software needs.
    Tonal Logo
    Aquabyte Logo
    More Cashback Rewards Logo
    MasterControl Logo
    Little Passports Logo
    Mido Lotto Logo

    home

    Need a B2B data source? Here’s our experience with ZoomInfo.

    Need a B2B data source? Here’s our experience with ZoomInfo.

    Share this article:

    Like many custom software development firms that provide services to other companies, CodeStringers utilizes, among other vehicles, email marketing to a “high accuracy” source of company and contact data. We have numerous genre’s of email program including monthly newsletters, prospecting (emails directly seeking new clients), and thought leadership (white papers and other “high value” content resources).

    Beyond the Obvious, What is “Data Quality”?

    Contact data quality can be evaluated by multiple metrics but the first “layer” of quality evaluation is the accuracy of contact information, notably email address and, if your sales organization makes outbound phone calls, office and/or mobile phone. So, when you’re buying or renting data, data accuracy is the first vendor selection criteria.

    The accuracy of email addresses in contact data sourced from providers is paramount. To combat spammers, the technical powers that be concerning how email servers work created something called a “reputation” score for each email address that sends emails, particularly bulk emails (one email sent to many recipients). When emails “bounce” (don’t reach the intended recipient because the email address is invalid), the reputation of the email address decreases. The lower the score, the more likely email spam filters will block delivery. Worse, send too much “spam” and your sender email address and/or the company domain may become blacklisted.

    When CodeStringers sought an email marketing data source a year ago, we narrowed the list to firms with a reputation and customer ratings indicating that they are industry leaders as measured by email address accuracy. In other words, we wanted to partner with the best available option as measured by accuracy.

    But data quality can go far beyond accuracy. After all, the business objective isn’t to “send email messages at a high rate of deliverability”. The business objective is to find matches between companies needing help with custom software development and what CodeStringers offers that aligns with their needs. In short, we want to identify potential new customers and ultimately provide services to them.

    Thus, many data providers attempt to go beyond simply providing company and contact data by providing other information that purports to give clients the ability to focus not simply on companies and contacts that match basic criteria, but upon the subset that have a higher purchase likelihood. When those capabilities are available – as they are from ZoomInfo and other higher end data companies – data quality really comes down to the percentage of raw contacts that ultimately convert to qualified sales opportunities.

    Cutting to the Chase.

    ZoomInfo’s sales team will state with pride during pre-sales phone calls that their data is 99% accurate. Nope.

    Our marketing automation system shows 92.4 percent deliverability, and that’s across a sample size that is statistically valid.

    The Basics of ZoomInfo’s Product.

    ZoomInfo is a web-based application through which users can search for both companies and contacts within those companies and then download the data or sync it to another business system such as a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system such as Salesforce, ZohoCRM or Freshsales.

    My use of the term “Search” is misplaced because in reality what ZoomInfo’s application does is allow you to configure a set of sophisticated filters for both company and contact attributes such that the number of matching companies and contacts narrows with each new filter criteria added.

    In the case of CodeStringers – and this is an important caveat concerning data accuracy – we are looking for software companies globally that meet specific criteria for revenue. Then we’re looking for contacts within those companies that are either buyers or purchase influencers for outsourced software development services. I state this merely to point out that perhaps other industries or contact criteria may improve data accuracy.

    ZoomInfo Email Address Accuracy (or the Lack Thereof).

    When we engaged with ZoomInfo, our team received an excellent sales presentation and demo of the product, and honestly, assuming that all the claims made by ZoomInfo’s sales people and marketing materials are accurate concerning data quality, most notably data accuracy.

    Our sales person, and later when we discovered problems, his manager clearly stated in multiple conversations that email addresses for ZoomInfo sourced contacts are 99 percent accurate, meaning that for every 100 emails sent, only one will bounce due to address inaccuracy (there are other factors that cause bounces). The reality is 92.4 percent accuracy and the sample size is statistically trustworthy.

    The sad irony of this is that, prior to paying ZoomInfo a LOT of money we used an inexpensive solution that scraped contact info from Linkedin. We paid $200 per month for the ability to pull as many as 20,000 contacts per month. And… (pause for effect in my best “Gru” voice), the GetProspect data accuracy as measured by email deliverability was MORE THAN that of ZoomInfo. We consistently saw 94 percent accuracy from GetProspect contact data.

    Hang in there… it gets worse.

    One of the main selling points for ZoomInfo was a capability called “Intent”. It’s meant to be exactly what it sounds like. For companies (not individual contacts), ZoomInfo professes to have some method of determining a company’s purchase intentions across a ZoomInfo created catalog of intents. In our case, two intents (of the six that came with our subscription) in the catalog relate to outsourcing services: “Offshore Software Development” and “Software Development Outsourcing”.

    The way intent works is as another filter in the search capability described above, except that the Intent is the first filter applied.

    So, as a user, I open the “Intent” page to search for companies that need custom software development help and:

    • Select the two Intent topics referenced above;
    • Set the Intent date range, meaning how far back in time the system looks for signals of buying intention;
    • Add industries, specifically those for other software companies;
    • Set company revenue ranges;
    • Add company location.

    ZoomInfo then shows me a list of matching companies and even shows an intent “signal score” that’s supposed to increase the higher the “accuracy” of intent. Once you have the list of companies, at the click of a button, ZoomInfo lets you search for contacts in those companies and then use all of the same filters to narrow the contact list by job title and other attributes.

    Our ZoomInfo Results.

    In the time we’ve used ZoomInfo, we’ve ONLY pulled contacts that show purchase “Intent” and match the other company and contact criteria. And our open and click through rates are within the “you’re doing pretty well” category for tech companies running similar campaigns, which suggests that the content of our emails is at least satisfactory.

    And for all of the money spent with ZoomInfo on data and the thousands of hours our sales and marketing teams have put into these programs, CodeStringers has not sourced a SINGLE NEW BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY from ZoomInfo data. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Nothing. Not a f#%king sausage.

    Typically, ZoomInfo commands a two-year contract among other terms. And, by default, the contract they ask you to sign will, like most SaaS companies, automatically renew. We made one good decision. We only signed a one-year contract and that contract does not automatically renew.

    And, needless to say, we won’t be choosing to renew it.

    Share this article:
    President & Chief Executive Officer

    About the author...

    Michael Manzo has nearly than 30 years of experience managing all aspects of software development including product management, user experience and interface design, engineering, quality assurance and marketing. Michael has served as President and CEO of CodeStringers since September 2014, having served as the company’s founding Chief Product Officer from July 2012. Prior to CodeStringers, Michael was Chief Marketing, Product and Strategy Officer at Openet, a leading global provider of transactional business and operational support system (B/OSS) software for telecom and cable firms, where he led marketing, product management, strategic planning and growth initiatives for the company. Manzo joined Openet as part of a turn-around team and, during his tenure, Openet grew from $15m in annual revenue to more than $150m, became the worldwide market share leader in the company’s primary product category, and developed a widely recognized reputation as the telecom infrastructure industry thought leader. Previously, Michael was Vice President of Products and Marketing for Traverse Networks, a fixed mobile convergence enterprise solution provider, which was acquired by Avaya. Michael has also held executive positions at Voice Access Technologies, Omnisky (acquired by EarthLink), Telocity (acquired by Hughes DirecTV), and Notify Technology Corporation. Michael has a BA in Journalism from the University of New Hampshire. In his spare time, Michael is an amateur woodworker, building indoor and outdoor furniture for friends and family. Until injuries sidelined him, Michael was an accomplished triathlete, having completed six Ironman distance races and numerous shorter distance races. Michael also served nine years in the U.S. Army Reserves and National Guard being honorably discharged as a Sergeant.

    Scroll to Top